Film Mario Salieri Streeming

Argentino Desert lies

Sunday, early for a Sunday, begin to look at the newspapers online. I say look, because reading, read what is said, is not. When finished with the serious daily, I go to some blogs. After the blogs, journals less serious, to get there embarrassment is Argentine Time. Touring is a complete editorial you think the national and popular culture over the human race. And what is already a brand of Kirchner, hunt in the zoo, so that the conclusion reached is that they think so, especially those who follow him and not opponents. Nobody in their right mind, and I know what I'm saying, read this rag unless you want to listen to the music of the song Kirchner.

But something I read caught my attention even more than usual. In a featured title, but also hidden digital version of the paper promises its readers, "Controversy of two writers on Argentina's military dictatorship" and had a debate between Mario Vargas Llosa and Juan José Saer. The lowering of the note said, quote, "In 1995, the Nobel Prize Literature published in The country an item on the chilling confessions of the soldiers who participated in the bloody repression. The author of a gloss, indignantly answered publicly. "

I was surprised enough to go into the note to see it said. I wanted to see what was the tone of a debate that I missed and will certainly interest me.

Grande my surprise, Saer at any time he is "outraged" with Mario Vargas Llosa, much less than that, use the Peruvian article in El Pais, Madrid, to think deeply about the dictatorship and Argentina. Allocates responsibilities assumed limitations and makes clever social state recognition of Argentina which promoted, accepted and endured the last coup, but nothing bad about the last Nobel prize. Of course, with justice, Saer one paragraph devastating to the political culture of violence, Montoneros, to ERP and their responsibilities obvious what the story then poured over all the Argentines.

Not that, even for a moment, would have thought that a newspaper like Argentina could play with time cleaning, but I think demonstration of contempt for his readers and, further, explains what happens when it comes the issue of opinion and the right to adequate communication with the banality. Another chapter worth the fictional construction of a past, present and future matter in which the Government is clearly the best student.

Should Brookstone Helo Spins As It Rises

FAMILIES OF RETALIATION WANT TO REFORM THE COMMON GRAVE

Womens Only Piercings

The group of relatives of those buried in mass grave in the cemetery stands up to the City

Councilman Municipal Utility, Mariano del Castillo, explained the reasons that the City claims to refuse to allow preparation of the mass grave in the cemetery by the group of relatives of those buried there.

Specifically, the mayor says the project for construction in the area of \u200b\u200bthe cemetery, a monument to remember the victims, can not be done because "you indicate municipal technicians."

"We can not give a concession for action there, because only licensed to perform work as an end with the burial of a body. As these graves are not going to produce, we can not grant any concessions," he said the councilman.

Mariano Del Castillo has been advanced that the City has a project same with the "let's dignify that area, and even now has the appropriate budget. The intention of the government team is to create "a space for anyone who wants to have a place to pray or simply to a relative or loved one at some point have been buried in this cemetery." The space

include any reference to those buried in the grave, to the civil war and Francoist repression. "We believe that these are wounds that are closed, and we do not need to be any reference or mention" concluded Del Castillo.

Rating
Izquierda Unida Minutes earlier, the Municipal spokesperson of the United Left, José Luis Maximiliano, also referred to the claim of the group of relatives of City Hall's refusal to allow the project

"We do not see anything wrong with these People have a project, and also have the necessary funding. Moreover, all it does is put the names of such persons, together with the motto 'for justice, freedom and democracy. "I do not know that can offend of this project to Antonio Román. Maybe it's not like that slogan, "said Maximilian, who insisted on not understanding" as the Popular Party opposes it. It seems a nonsense total. Maybe they do not want is that people who pass by wonder what happened to all those names, and to know what had happened. "

IU spokesman has analyzed the draft submitted by the group relatives of those buried in the grave, and reiterated that "if they come to us, certainly support their initiative."

Brookstone Tsa Lock Change The Combination

Scenes From Bad

Scene One: Libya

The outcome of the episode of popular rebellion in Libya does not support or allow overstepping conjecture considerations positive. There is much internal and external rumpus to recognize someone who is good. But there is one thing Obviously, the Libyan regime's oppression, enslavement and death. It is a regime that employs censorship, violence and torture against opponents and a regime that is held in a debased relationship between politics and religious fanaticism. At present the country is in a state of tremendous devastation and opponents are treated "like rats" in the words of the dictator Qaddafi. In the last week 69,000 people fled to refugee status Libya

Scene two: financial penalty for a private consulting firm that released its own data on inflation.

government blatantly lying about cost of living indexes and price evaluation fined 500,000 pesos to a private consultant issued a measuring their own work, of course, dispute the official figures. A strategy abusive, authoritarian, intimidating and cowardly run from a particular state for a reason directly connected to a public policy advocated by the Government. It is not fair trade or a reasonable state interference in terms of control but a violent attitude, judgmental and clumsy National Government represented by the Government.

Scene Three: Intellectual Kirchner Vargas Llosa does not want to open the Book Fair. The president seems much and intellectuals retract

Exciting free sample (?) Of ineffectiveness militant intellectual cowardice, this episode becomes apparent height of the participants. First, the arguments against Horacio González Vargas Llosa, well away from Florida but cryptic prose, showed a very strong authoritarian bent. Forster followed, of course, reaffirming the national character of the order of "runs" (up there democratic temperament) of Nobel writer. But what happened? A President It seemed a lot and told them to tone down and withdraw the request. And what did they do? Declined the request, leaving it very clear what their militant mood, and what degree of submissiveness and lack of personal discretion. The truth is that even with the barbarity that contains the original request, surely a response to an interpretation supported. The only decent thing was to stay in that position and banks to come, with the separation of the charge included in the case of Gonzalez. Imagine for a moment that one of the heroes of our intellectuals have acted like they almost do not exist in racing humanistic literature. Imagine the very Gramsci (probably admired to Open Letter), meekly obeying political orders of the Communist Party chief.

These three scenes, different in density, size and grandeur, are united on one point. In all three cases there was a rapid, specific and firm in any relevant political actor of the opposition. With the exception of Margarita Stolbizer, that days later asked the Government to break diplomatic relations with Libya, none of the candidates for president, for example, rejecting the situation said. The Government is a shy enough sampling of concern and parties (I mean their bodies institutional) did not like a topic that had something to say. No site has even resulted in favor of it. Nor has any portal of human rights organizations felt compelled to reference and take a stand. The same with the case of the consultant. No one seemed an excessive use of state power, no one seemed to be threatened the freedom to express opinions and the freedom of work. Not a single party, no single organization of citizens, not a single NGO that works similar themes say a word. About the farce between intellectuals and government made jokes. It is true that the pathos of the episode deserves mocking laughter, but serious thing that a group of outstanding teachers is shown as explicitly as state employees without their own criteria.

Nobody felt called to do a serious analysis, large, what they mean one of three scenes in terms of quality of our democracy. Surely this reflects a more widespread social temperament of what you wanted. It does not seem possible to think that this can happen if you do not have a social state and collective that fosters and to the line. Argentina democratic life loses power while the heat of populist promises to share voice, announces and welcomes crowds congratulations. Maybe it is time to think if you really do not have the unbridled Unsharp consequences of identity politics that allows any possibility of agreement is possible, that any "electoral assembly" can take place. You may need to consider for a moment at least, that actions have consequences and that the pursuit of immediate revenue pops hopes to have, once, with a democracy pleasant, quiet, restrained, but livable.