Argentina policy is having problems if you look in profile. Not that I do not have them if you look ahead, but worsen the time to observe how, with what attitudes, what logic and what types of agreements proposed by the various political forces. Any mortal, even one who is kept out of politics, is able to see that the profiles have been blurred to reach its parody.
you might say is not a new problem. It could be argued that workers were always represented by the right, the Liberals were almost fascist or within Peronism comes from Rosa Luxemburg to Lopez Rega through Laclau. But that, you know, is in some ways the realm of history. Let's leave it to historians, that there are very good.
The Unsharp update dilemma (rare word) is now in the hands of political expression close to what is known, for want of a better picture as progressivism. For some time this part all seems possible, in terms of names, political and electoral arrangements on the banks of the center. The lists for the next election may contain almost any combination, from the vulgar to the most imaginative.
in the country in the world where it is easier and costs less to reach the card progressive parties and groups from the moderate left blatantly play the same game as always noted for their immorality, the right. The Groucho Marxist, if the polls say the public does not want for this district, will be presented in another. If those same polls show no to MP, can say that if a president or legislator. Many even use the power of the media, who transcribed the thoughtful and persevering work of the consultants manufacturing applications with an ease and a staggering childishness.
As much as it hurts those who belong in some way to this continent, political, institutional practices, their logic of conflict resolution and leadership patterns are the most conservative of Argentina's policy of what addition, in these times, the problems of profile.
There is another interpretation, complementary and more distressing. It emerged that in reality everything is possible because it is also a lie. Nobody really wants to do what he says he really wants to do. It may not be entirely wrong to think that nobody or almost nobody seriously wants to institutionalize a progressive front but the intention is to stand out the best possible in terms of fees, in the next election. Only then can one explain that take precedence delirious amalgam rather than rational thinking and hospital agreements that allow live to ways of perceiving the world do not always coincide. Perhaps not too late to replace temporary entanglements agreements principles and objectives. Maybe we still have time to think together what kind of society we want for ourselves and for those who come. If we want an open and cosmopolitan or closed in on itself, a society that creates opportunities for personal growth or who profit from the conceptual component of poverty as their reason for being political.
have to work hard and fast. We are too close to the absence of intelligence and lack of a medium and long term, to guide and strangers in the building of a democratic leftist political hope will constitute the prelude to a stage where Peronism in two versions, like Janus, who decides on the future.
0 comments:
Post a Comment